Wednesday 6 February 2013

Whatever happened to Mary Lennox?

The last time I re-read this book - a favourite of mine - I thought about what lay ahead of children of the generation Burnett was writing for and about, inexorably, threatening to wipe out all Mary and Colin's newly-gained happiness and confidence, and health.

The Secret Garden was published in 1911. Colin and Mary are ten, we are told, and Dickon, the appealing Yorkshire animal-whisperer, is 'about twelve.' Maybe Colin escapes active service in World War One by the skin of his teeth, but I always think the age of characters is fixed at the moment the author starts writing, which is usually about a year earlier. That would make Colin old enough to be called up in 1917. Perhaps he falsifies his age and goes a year earlier. While Dickon would have gone two years earlier, in 1915.

What remained of 'the magic' that got Colin on his feet again when he or Dickon crouched in rat-infested trenches, among mud and blood and lice, with the guns going off?  Were they able to hold onto even a spark of the joy that Burnett preached, or even remember the moor, the garden, the birds and beasts and their friendship? Or did Colin crack up again, and end the war on the pages of Regeneration? Perhaps Dickon tamed a rat or two - but there wouldn't have been time. Did either survive, either physically or psychologically? And Mary, what about her?

The Secret Garden' leaves us at that moment when Colin and his father stride happily back towards the house with Colin walking 'as strongly and steadily as any boy in Yorkshire.' As a child, reading it, I noticed the omission of Mary from this scene, and understood, with hurt and indignation, that Colin, being a boy, was supposed to be more significant. And in the latter part of the book, Mary fades behind Colin, while the story focuses more and more on his restoration to health and mastery.

Mary's transformation from an ugly little girl who nobody likes, to a child who is healthy, happy, and pretty - and nurturative, as girls were meant to be in that era - is carried out, it seems, mainly for the sake of Colin - and yet I rather like Mary's spikiness. I think she gets a raw deal from her author right from the start, actually. 'Nobody had ever taken any notice of her' says Hodgson Burnett, 'because she was disagreeable.' Which is an appalling thing to say, when you think about it. Nobody ever loved her, not even the Ayah who took care of her, so how could she be agreeable? It's not her fault. And - thinking about the Ayah - Kipling, brought up by Indian nurses, adored India, and it was when he came back to England and dumped with a harsh, uncaring woman that he was desperately unhappy. Mary remembers the Indian chanting song her Ayah used to sing her to sleep with - and yet she's never allowed to miss her. Of course, I can see why. It's racism. England stands for happiness, beauty, health. India is death, unhappiness, and spoilt, monstrous children. It is only in England that Mary may find her salvation.

But in the same way that I want Mary to have cared for her Ayah, I also want her to retain some spikiness. How did she react to the War, with its flood of death, she who hid in the Indian bungalow while everyone died around her? I thought at first that she might become a nurse, but she was too young to be a VAD; they had to be eighteen. So maybe she joined local women scraping lint and knitting things for the troops, while every day she stood supportively beside Archibald Craven and shared his dreadful anxiety as they looked at the casualty lists together. And maybe she raged at having to do so little.

If Colin could have cracked up, Mary could have hardened up again. I think that she was fundamentally tougher than Colin, and I can imagine her, after the war, cutting her hair, dressing in short skirts, even finding work for herself. I wonder how much money her parents left her? If Colin had been killed, Archibald Craven might have made her his heir, if the property wasn't entailed, in which case the doctor would have got it after all.

I don't think she married Colin, though, even though he survived. For some reason, I feel really resistant to that idea, and not just because they were first cousins.

What do you think happened?

6 comments:

  1. I was in love with Dickon ( although only realised that in recent years) so maybe that is who she chose. Although Dickon would have been front line cannon fodder and in his own way, as a young upper class male, so would Colin - leading his men out at 18 with just a pistol in his hand. Lovely new blog - I'm going to enjoy this one Elli!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a gorgeous post and blog! I guess you are all too right about Dickon's and Colin's probable fate. But I think when Burnett says 'No one had ever taken any notice of her because she was disagreeable', she knew what she was doing, and intended the irony - don't you? Isn't it an implied criticism of the adults in Mary's life - not one of whom is up to much.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the 1987 Hallmark film, the main story was framed by a scene in which adult Mary (in an army nurse's uniform) meets adult Colin (played by Colin Firth, every inch the young army officer), and love is very definitely in the air. Since she is now simply the daughter of a family friend transatlantic incest worries arise. In between spooning they take a moment, if I recall, to lament to fate of Dickon at the Somme.

    It's not my favourite.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds horrid, Catherine, but I think there is always a problem with writing sequels to beloved books! I hate the wiping-out of their cousinship, too. But it's not incest to marry your first cousin under British, or surely, US law?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh no...I can't bear to think of beloved Dickon in the trenches...but of course you're right. And now do I have to think about the Bastables, and Peter from 'The Railway Children' (officer material, surely?), and Cyril and Robert and even the Lamb (was he a boy baby?) in uniform and worse. Well, obviously Bobbie would have been a VAD...I will certainly take care to avoid that 1987 film - thank you for the warning.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Lamb was a boy, yes, and the Wouldbegoods happens at the same time as the Boer War, so the kids there would presumably still be in the age-group to be called up. It does put the military enthusiasms in the book in perspective, doesn't it? But you know, being born only a few years after the 2nd World War ended, I spent my childhood expecting the next, feeling that experiencing a war was somehow inevitable, a rite of passage, as it had been for the previous generations.

    ReplyDelete